| Course | PSY101 – Introduction to Psychology |
| Topic | Classical, Operant & Observational Learning |
| Level | First-year undergraduates (no prior background) |
| Duration | 120 minutes |
| Class size | 90 students |
| Pedagogy | Social Constructivism (Vygotsky / ZPD) |
7 ILOs across Bloom's taxonomy — including AI literacy outcomes
Required readings, diagnostic quiz, guiding questions & AI journal task
Conditioned Classroom hook, AI focus activity, misconception analysis (15 min)
4 segments: Classical, Operant, Observational & Synthesis Mural (85 min)
Post-test, peer reflection, AI discussion & next steps (15 min)
Formative, summative, AI Transparency Statement & rubrics
10-slide academic presentation with fullscreen & download
Tools, inclusivity strategies, TA notes & instructor script
Knowledge is co-constructed through peer interaction, discussion, and collaborative meaning-making. Students work within their Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), supported by peers and instructor scaffolding.
AI tools are positioned as stimuli for critical discourse — not authoritative sources. Students evaluate, critique, and override AI outputs, developing independent judgment and ethical awareness.
ILOs span Analyze → Apply → Evaluate → Create. Activities scaffold progressively from individual comprehension to collaborative synthesis.
| ILO | Key Activity | Assessment | AI Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 – Analyze classical conditioning | Mini-lecture + AI critique worksheet | Group critique; Post-test Q1 | AI examples as error-rich stimuli |
| 2 – Differentiate theories | Cross-theory comparison; Bobo Doll | Pre/Post-test; Portfolio case study | AI boundary confusion forces differentiation |
| 3 – Apply operant principles | Reinforcement Design Challenge | Portfolio case study; Padlet plans | AI plan critique → human override |
| 4 – Evaluate strengths/limits | Bobo Doll ethics; media violence discussion | Portfolio limitations sections | AI omission of cultural/ethical nuance |
| 5 – Collaborative synthesis | Learning Theory Mural poster | Peer evaluation; Case study | Group adopt/modify/reject AI slogans |
| 6 – Critically evaluate AI | All AI tasks; pre-class journal | AI Transparency Statement | Core AI literacy outcome |
| 7 – Reflect on AI ethics | Closure AI reflection discussion | Transparency Statement; Exit ticket | Ethical AI integration as curriculum goal |